<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python Trick: Check for Substring</title>
	<link>http://bka-bonn.de/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/26/python-trick-check-for-substring/</link>
	<description>This is C++, we all have our segfaults.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Python: check for substring speed &#124; Patrick's playground</title>
		<link>http://bka-bonn.de/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/26/python-trick-check-for-substring/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Python: check for substring speed &#124; Patrick's playground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bka-bonn.de/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/26/python-trick-check-for-substring/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] to check if a certain substring (in my case ' FROM ') is present in a SQL query string when I found this blog entry. Just for fun I decided to have a look at how fast these checks would be compared to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to check if a certain substring (in my case &#8216; FROM &#8216;) is present in a SQL query string when I found this blog entry. Just for fun I decided to have a look at how fast these checks would be compared to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
